InnoHome Charlie samme problem som Easee?

[kjbu]

Jeg har ladeboks fra InnoHome, type Charlie-1, kjøpt hos Elektroimportøren.
https://innohome.com/no/produkter/innohome-charlie/

Pga. problemet som Easee har kommet opp i så stilte jeg spørsmål til InnoHome om de har valgt å bruke samme type vern som Easee (ikke-elektromekanisk).

Hvordan tolker dere svaret til InnoHome? Se svar under.



1.       The device is designed and made according to all applicable technical and safety regulations.

2.       Electrical installations and connections are carried out by a qualified electrician and in compliance with local regulations.
 

1.       Innohome Charlie charging stations have been tested by an independent, accredited testing laboratory before bringing them to the market. All the applicable standards are listed in our Installation and User Guide under EU Declaration of Conformity. It can be found behind this link: https://www.innohome.techmanuals.info/charlie/EN/topics/conformity_certificates.html

2.       According to elinstallatoren.se "Each connection point must be protected individually by an earth fault circuit breaker max 30 mA, according to the Electrical Installation Regulations SS 4364000 point 722.531.2.101."

This requirement is the same in Finland (picture below).

Charlie charging stations have a built-in 6mA DC residual current monitor, which in addition requires a Type-A residual-current device on the supply side, as described in our installation instructions. Both together, these cover the safety requirements for DC and AC residual current protection.

Referring to the Elsäkerhetsverkets article, Easee has used an electronic earth fault circuit breaker solution instead of an electromechanical one.

In Innohome Charlie installation guide, we always direct to make sure that a Type-A ≤ 30mA RCD (Residual Current Device) is installed.


Du kan ikke vise dette vedlegget.

[Erik Ola Ulvestad]

Bortsett frå "according to all applicable..." som i så fall skal bety at dei har brukt vern med mekanisk samankobling og tilstrekkelig gnistgap, så tolkar eg det som at dei ikkje svarer på ditt spørsmål.

[Nnhm]

Hi, Innohome support here. We came across this post and saw our answer wasn't as clear as we wanted it to be. Sorry about that!

We cannot really talk about other companies as their products are not our specialty. We can, however, talk about our products and how we do things at Innohome.

To put it shortly, our choice of protection is an electromechanical one.

The solution for DC and AC residual current protection described in our original answer is a very typical one you'll see in a lot of EV chargers. We chose it too, because it is safe, it is cheaper for the user and/or the installer*, and it is in accordance with the standards.

Another commenter pointed out sufficient spark gap. According to the standards, that gap should be 3mm and that is the case in Charlie EV chargers.

Please don't hesitate to mail us support@innohome.com shall any more questions arise

(*Type-A residual current device is a lot cheaper than type-B version. The latter is usually needed if there is no built-in 6mA DC residual current monitor in the charging station.)